Login Register
 °

Wadebridge School boycotts leisure centre

By Cornish Guardian  |  Posted: April 24, 2013

UNAFFORDABLE:  Wadebridge School says it can no longer afford to use the leisure centre.

UNAFFORDABLE: Wadebridge School says it can no longer afford to use the leisure centre.

Comments (2)

WADEBRIDGE School has boycotted the neighbouring leisure centre after demands that it should pay more than £40,000 a year to use it.

The school insists the sports hall at the complex was originally built for the benefit of its pupils and the wider community, and says it cannot afford the huge fee.

Wadebridge School became an academy last year, and now receives funding from central government instead of through Cornwall Council.

Because it opted out of local education authority control, the council and Carrick Leisure, the company which manages the centre, has told the school it now has to pay up to use its sports hall and changing rooms.

Related content

Head teacher Tina Yardley said the school felt it should not be charged to use the sports hall, and it would not be using any part of Wadebridge Leisure Centre again this summer, after negotiations over payment failed to reach a resolution.

She said the school considered the sports hall in the centre to be "ours".

In a letter to pupils, Miss Yardley said: "We have never had to pay to use our own sports hall, but we do pay to use the swimming pool, as this was added later.

"Things were still not resolved before the Easter holidays and we have had to make the decision not to use the sports centre at all this summer term while the meetings go on and the council decide what they might charge in the future. What we can't do at the moment is to carry on using it and then be asked for a very large sum of money that we just don't have.

"There's also the principle to be fought for."

The council said in a statement it was "disappointed" with Miss Yardley's comments in her letter to pupils "given that we are still in negotiation with the school to find a solution".

It said: "When the school transferred to academy status, it became responsible for its budgets, including the costs associated with using the leisure centre.

"All schools planning to transfer to academy status were made aware of the impact the transfer would have on their budget responsibilities," it said.

The school said in a statement: "The school is willing to contribute towards the running costs of the sports hall to reflect our use of these facilities, but the level of contribution has to be based on a realistic and fair figure that is affordable and, at this present moment in time, the council has not been able to provide this.

"The school cannot commit itself to an unknown and ongoing liability that would put significant pressure on the school budget that could lead to teacher redundancies and larger class sizes."

Read more from Cornish Guardian

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters

2 comments

  • jimjams2011  |  April 24 2013, 8:12PM

    I'm with the leisure centre on this one. The Fact is Academies aim to destroy the jobs of established teachers (who are on the higher pay scales) whilst employing new cheaper teachers whilst creaming off the rest of the money into the pockets of the executives. It can't all be 'take take take' from the local community. The Academy has for free, a school that our community paid for.

    |   5
  • ramehead  |  April 24 2013, 9:46AM

    Take this Governments shilling and suffer the consequences. You've become a business which means Council(residents tax) funding goes!

    |   15

      YOUR COMMENTS AWAITING MODERATION

       
       
       

      MORE NEWS HEADLINES